The Treaty of Waitangi is not some abstract notion of little importance to anyone. It is New Zealand’s founding constitutional document, and it affects our lives in various real ways, legally and by the manner in which we conduct our public affairs. Waitangi Day is our country’s national day and it is a day worth celebrating, not something to be slightly ashamed of.
Wellingtonians have the opportunity to mark today by checking out the actual Treaty document. Yes, the very one signed on this day in 1840 by Captain William Hobson, RN and the assembled chiefs of the northern tribes at Waitangi. Not many people seem to know that the Treaty is on permanent display in the Constitution Room at Archives NZ in Mulgrave St, Wellington, opposite Aitken St. Archives is open today from 10am to 4pm specially for people to look at the Treaty. Go there.
The Treaty was a product of both missionary and official British desire to ensure Maori were treated substantially better than indigenous Australians were when formal British occupation of their country began 52 years before Waitangi. Though settler honouring of the Treaty only lasted until their demands for land exceeded iwi willingness to sell, much that happened in New Zealand was still far and away better than what happened in Australia, as I wrote in my December article on new Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd’s intention finally to say “sorry” to the Aborigines for the shameful way they were treated for the best part of 200 years.
Despite the land grabs that took place here and the suppression of much of Maori culture until about 1970, many good things happened too, especially in comparison with Australia and many other colonised countries, and more has been done to make amends in the past three decades than probably anywhere else.
In 1869, a full 100 years before Australian Aborigines were allowed to vote, the colonial New Zealand Parliament extended the franchise to all Maori men, at a time many settler men remained excluded. Maori had to vote in the four special seats created for them, but the fact they were allowed to vote was an important and enlightened development for the time, 24 years before our pioneering enfranchisement of women. New Zealand never had laws overtly discriminating against Maori or preventing them from taking part in civil and political life. Intermarriage has been common and accepted here since Europeans started arriving, to the extent that most people of Maori ancestry now also have European ancestry. There has always been a general goodwill between the races here, even during times of strain and controversy. Since 1970 there has been a remarkable renaissance of Maori culture, language and participation in the political process. The creation of the Waitangi Tribunal in 1975 led to the continuing, honorable, bipartisan settling of land and other grievances dating back to colonial times, a process Australia has barely begun. Not everyone has been happy with the settlement process. Many Pakeha were at the beginning suspicious and opposed, though that has now much waned. Many Maori still feel it is taking too long. But it is nonetheless taking place.
These are things to reflect on, to celebrate and be proud of today, 168 years after the signing of the Treaty. As John Clarke used to sing in his Fred Dagg days, sometimes we don’t know how lucky we are.
Other Waitangi blogging: Stef the Ex-expat has a thoughtful Waitangi Day essay on Pakeha learning te reo. David Farrar says Helen Clark blundered by staying away from Te Tii Marae, while John Key looked prime ministerial. David makes the hilarious point that only in New Zealand could one see the spectacle of someone like John Key “shaking hands with Tame Iti, who was arrested by the police for allegedly being the leader of a group which aimed, amongst other things, to assassinate [him].” Not PC has an interesting, black-letter-law, Eurocentrist view of the Treaty, which, probably deliberately, misses the point that times change. Chris Bourke delves back into his Truth archives to affirm why we need Waitangi Day, including rediscovering the racist Pukekohe barber shop and cinema mentioned in this article.
10 Comments
February 6, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Meh… my partner and I have just returned from a family picnic, on the spot where we spread his sister’s ashes four years ago today.
Seemed fitting somehow — on a day when the bullshit is spread wide and thick, to focus directly on the basics no Treaty is ever going to articulate, under a wide, blazing utterly indifferent sky, surrounded by people just buggering on with their little, wonderful lives.
February 6, 2008 at 7:50 pm
TV3, 6pm news.
It opens with a fire in the old Patea freezing works, no victims. It shifts to Super Tuesday and that goes for some time.. a couple of other items.
Then 10 minutes in, a minute on Waitangi, followed by various political aspects of the day and much emphasis on Tama Iti, his son and Annette Sykes with Hone Harawera declaring National as the Devil and Labour as the Devil’s brother, or somesuch.
Ho hum, that’s Waitangi, famous for a holiday.. now, onto the News.
TV3 got it right. Its only a day for some Maori and best to get it over with. Now on to the real day that NZers have some care about.. Anzac Day.
JC
February 6, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Any least Iti left his guns at home this year.
What a nothing sort of day.
Bring on the Republic ?
February 6, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Now on to the real day that NZers have some care about.. Anzac Day.
Where we commemorate a massacre born out of magisterial incompetence — which is saying quite a lot, even by the far from demanding standards of the First World War.
And might it be in order for New Zealanders to remember the British, French and Canadians by any measure suffered more grievous casualties in the Dardanelles?
February 6, 2008 at 9:29 pm
A very thoughtful piece, Poneke. I disagree with dad4justice and JC who dismiss Waitangi as a “nothing sort of day” or “ho hum, a holiday”
The day IS maturing, and becoming more significant, but sadly less so by pakeha, and less so as one travels south through the country.
43,000 people travelling to Waitangi cannot be dismissed lightly, along with significant gatherings in Auckland, Hamilton and Wellington, and even enough people in Kaiapoi to stage a world record number of people doing a haka.
Those who take the time to experience Waitangi celebrations will find something different than what may be expected from the media headlines which accentuate the negatives and the diffferences. It seems to me to be more a tolerance and a celebration of diversity than anything else.
I expect Waitangi will become a day that more and more New Zealanders will consider worth celebrating – for what it is, and not in some sort of comparison with other days of significance in New Zealand. Certainly not anything to be ashamed of. Why should anyone be?
February 7, 2008 at 12:38 am
Craig,
The increasing support for Anzac Day could hardly be due to just mourning the dead, after all, we are now 3-4 generations removed from the conflict.
Rather it’s that we recognise that we grew up as a nation in that it was *our* dead, not Britain’s. It may also be the where the seeds for our somewhat antiwar attitudes come from, a thread that’s run through our politics and foreign policy ever since.
Whatever Waitangi was, it is no longer. Within a decade or so it was no longer viable as the land grabs and war occurred. In other words, we “parked” Waitangi and right up to the 70’s just gave it a day for skiting that we had the “best race relations in the world”.. and we lost even that 3 decades ago.
Other events have also conspired against Waitangi.. Maori are now at least 6 eights Pakeha and the country is multicultural, not bi cultural. And I think NZers are looking for a day that unites us, not divides.
JC
February 7, 2008 at 9:20 am
Thanks for the link. I had been mulling around on it for ages but Waitangi day pushed me to finish writing it.
February 7, 2008 at 5:00 pm
I agree with you JC on Anzac Day. It represent a time when NZers finally realised how different they were from the old home country. That’s why more and more young people in NZ are identifying with it now and turning up to Anzac Day celebrations.
I’m afraid I disagree about Waitangi Day, however. It is very relevant but just not “popular” at the moment. The mainstream media like it for potential controversial headlines but other than that, it’s not interesting to them. As I see it, the beauty of Waitangi Day is that it represents an annual stocktaking day for the Maori/Pakeha relationship – not necessarily the real relationship but the theoretical one. I wish people weren’t so afraid of that and would accept the day as it is – a day off in summer, a day to ponder our race relations, a day to celebrate all those good things pointed out by Poneke in this lovely blog, and a day to ponder the things that aren’t right as presented by disaffected Maori.
Our country is a work in progress. We are still very young and each Waitangi Day does not have to represent an end point of race relations. There’s time and a will to go on and improve the lot of everyone.
We are so lucky to have an strong indigenous population that is cross-pollinating with a strong immigrant stock to, hopefully, come up with a world-leading combo.
I love Waitangi Day and it IS our national day even if we haven’t quite grown into it yet.
February 7, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Nice comment , Luke, right on the spot !
February 10, 2008 at 9:40 am
Disagree about ANZAC Day. Please! – it is a commemoration of an episode of war and has become a commemoration of all those who have served NZ in armed forces. Fine. Good thing to do. It is not our national day.
Waitangi Day is. Agree that the media have decided to focus on potential conflict and most people now seem to see it as a day of conflict. What fascinated me is how in my circles there are so many comments about it being a “maori day”. There is a resentment about the focus on the Maori side of things. A reflection of the deep vein of racism that still courses through our culture?
I think the sooner people like NotPC get to grips with the LEGAL reality of the Treaty and stop trying to reargue points very clearly settled in the 1970’s the sooner we can start looking at the day for what it is. A day to commemorate and celebration a unique relationship that allows all of us to live here in peace. To celebrate the fact we CAN have a bit of argie about the issues (and god knows there’s still a bit to sort out – we’ve only been doing this for 160 odd years!) AND still take the kids to the beach and enjoy the paradise in which we live.