November 14, 2009

Hysterical media Roman circus a disturbing challenge to civil society

The increasingly hysterical mass media in English speaking countries has become a dangerous lynch mob, baying for blood like the crowds at Roman circuses, demanding no mercy for whoever be the unpopular figure in their quest for an inflammatory headline.

Today’s example is a particularly savage story in the once paper-of-reasonable-record The New Zealand Herald, winding the rest of the media, talkback and the blogosphere into a rage over murderer Mark Burton “getting ACC” to buy him a prosthetic leg to replace the one he lost when police shot him soon after he killed innocent bystander Karl Kuchenbecker and shot four others on a rampage in Wellington in January 2007.

“Double-murderer Graeme Burton received a free titanium artificial leg worth $10,000 from ACC to replace the right leg lost when he went on a lethal shooting rampage two years ago,” says this incitement to outrage by reporter Jared Savage.

Well, no. Burton did not get ACC to to buy him an artificial leg, and as a convicted criminal he is not entitled to accident compensation for his injuries.

Anyone who loses a leg in New Zealand, whether by accident, illness, or by having the police justifiably blast it off to protect innocent lives, is entitled to the same and the best medical and prosthetic treatment available.

The most appalling feature of this lazy piece of “journalism” is Savage going to Karl Kuchenbecker’s father, Paul, for comment. It is a credit to Mr Kuchenbecker that his moderate condemnation did not provide the outraged response being the Herald would have been seeking.

“We’ve helped him to hurt someone else,” Mr Kuchenbecker understandably and calmly said. “The taxpayers helped him to continue his rampage while inside. We’ve given him the mobility to do this.”

Thank god the Herald was unable to contact the Senseless Sentencing Trust before its deadline last night.

Ultimately, a society is judged by the way it treats its most unpopular members, be they the welfare recipients so despised by the Right, or unrepentant murderers like Burton, despised by many and feared by most.

It might enrage the Herald that Burton was fitted with an artificial leg that enabled him to chase gang member and fellow inmate Dwayne Marsh through Paremoremo prison to stab him in the heart, but what is their alternative? That Burton remain legless and hop about?

David Farrar wants that, of course, as does his hate brigade. What a frightening bunch.

Nobody, anywhere, could have sympathy for Burton. He is one of the most dangerous inmates in New Zealand, an inmate at huge risk to other prisoners, prison guards, and anyone who might come near him – witness the many prison officers needed to surround him in court to prevent him wreaking havoc there on his too frequent appearances.

He will never, ever, be released from prison, except in a coffin, and he is now rightly in solitary confinement where he should stay until he is too old and frail to do harm to another person. Let us all hope he does not manage to kill anyone else during the many years he will remain inside until his death.

But he should still not be denied the medical care available to everyone else. To deny him that would be a stain on our civilised society, however much that would reap cheers from the news media, the Insensible Sentencing Trust, talkbackland and the wastes of the blogosphere.

As media outlets continue their dive to the sewers in their quest to deliver audiences even more facile and inflammatory trash-pieces, this abandonment of any attempt at presenting serious news presented seriously will just keep getting worse.

By villifying everything and everyone who can be scapegoated, and by promoting hysteria and lynch mobs, the media is tearing down the very foundations of civil society. It is a disturbing trend and a challenge to civil society that will not be easy to overcome.

November 11, 2009

Courts declare Global Warming a protected religion, while crucifixes are banned in Italian schools

Sanity will prevail. One day. Perhaps.

It’s been obvious for a very long time that the fervent “belief” some people have in human-induced climate change is closer to religion than science. Now a court has ruled that climate change is indeed a religion with its believers able to claim legal protection for their faith.

In a landmark decision in London, Justice Sir Michael Burton has declared that redundant worker Tim Nicholson’s views on global warming are so deeply held that they are worthy of the same protection as religious beliefs.

“A belief in man-made climate change, and the alleged resulting moral imperatives, is capable if genuinely held, of being a philosophical belief for the purpose of the 2003 Religion and Belief Regulations,” His Honour said in a written decision.

Nicholson claimed he was sacked by Grainger, the UK’s largest listed residential property company, because of his views on the company’s attitude to climate change. The company said he was made redundant because of the economic downturn.

Justice Burton’s decision will enable Nicholson to take Grainger to an employment tribunal to claim he was sacked because of his religious beliefs.

The case comes as the proponents of global warming are mounting a hysterical propaganda war around the world in the countdown to the UN’s climate change summit in Copenhagen next month.

Hysterical, because the “scientific” basis for their economy-wrecking cause collapses further by the week, leaving them to demand everyone “believe” their mantras.

The most-read post on this blog was the April 2008 revelation that average world temperatures had not increased since 1998 despite continued growth in carbon dioxide emissions. This post continues to get dozens of hits every day and has now been read twice as many times as the next most popular post.

The post was about a BBC news story that quoted temperature data from the UN’s very own World Meteorological Organisation. Both the BBC and the WMO are ardent believers in global warming. Until their revelation, I had actually believed the propaganda that temperatures were going constantly up. The BBC story was such dynamite that the Global Warming Thought Police put heavy pressure on the BBC to recant it.

It is becoming ever clearer that the inconvenient scientific truth is somewhat different from the shrill propaganda. The world’s climate is always changing. A thousand years ago, temperatures were warmer than now as the world basked in the Medieval Warm Period, during which the Vikings settled Greenland and grapes were grown in the north of England. But temperatures gradually fell again, until the Little Ice Age of the mid-1700s, in which the Thames froze, glaciers advanced across Europe and Greenland had become so covered in snow and ice that the Viking settlements lay long abandoned.

There were no SUVs in the Medieval Warm Period, nor for 200 years after the Little Ice Age, but after the latter, the world gradually began warming again, with ebbs and flows about every 40 or 50 years that led to the same alarmists who today claim we are going to cook claiming in 1975 that we were entering a new ice age, because of global cooling from 1940 and then.

Of course, once that claim was made, another warming cycle began.

The BBC recently updated last year’s story, again having to concede that average world temperatures have still not risen since 1998, in complete contravention of the computer climate models the warmists use to push their religious beliefs.

After 11 years now without global warming, and with temperatures actually falling in many places, it seems about time for the Warmers to confront the fact we just may be entering another cyclical cooling phase. That might allow time to conduct some actual rather than computerised work on the human effect on the climate before rushing in to Copenhagen’s religious indulgences, pardon, emissions trading scams, sorry, schemes, that will greatly enrich the same money merchants who wrecked the global economy last year, while doing nothing actually to reduce the supposedly dangerous emissions.

There are two delicious ironies to Justice Burton’s declaration that climate change is a religious belief.

First, Justice Burton is the very same High Court judge who ruled in 2007 that warmist cardinal Al Gore’s propaganda film An Inconvenient Truth included nine serious scientific errors, one of them that the South Pacific ocean was rising and island-dwellers had been forced to evacuate to New Zealand. The judge ruled this arch-work of mass deception could only be shown in schools if accompanied by a countering viewpoint.

The second irony is that it comes at the same time as the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that Italian schools must remove the crucifixes that have adorned their walls for decades, as crucifixes represent an ancient religion, Christianity, which is apparently now frowned upon by the courts in Europe just as the new religion, Climate Change, is welcomed.

Jesus wept.

November 11, 2009

Yesterday when the war begins

On the eleventh hour, of the eleventh day, of the eleventh month in 1918, World War II began.

Lest we forget.

November 8, 2009

Hypocrisy rampant

Well, well, well. Hone goes off for a love-fest in Paris (paid for by the white motherfuckers he so despises) while supposedly on an official trip to Brussels. Rodney gets himself an official trip to LA and London really to have a love-fest, and deliberately times it to be at the time of a family wedding. Oh, and another in Hawaii, too!

Now I, as a humble private sector scribe, was many times sent overseas for work. Many were the times I was away from my beloved for 10 days or even more. We survived. We used the telephone (at our expense).

The thought that my employer would pay for my beloved to travel with me never once entered my head and I bet that goes for almost everyone in the private sector.

In Parliament, however, they expect as of right — nay, ENTITLEMENT — that their other half will go with them for nookie and sightseeing, under the guise of an official visit. It’s all parties and almost all MPs.

None of them should be allowed to do this, with the exception of the prime minister, who should always be allowed to travel with his or her spouse/partner as it is expected they will meet other leaders who will have their other halves at such meetings. The spouse/partner/FB of a prime minister represents our country too on such official trips.

Good on the nice Mr Key for paying for his wife’s trips with him, following the precedent set by Peter Davis, who paid for himself when he travelled with Helen Clark (even to Wellington for official functions), despite being entitled to taxpayer-funded travel as an MP’s spouse.

I doubt Bronagh gets much sightseeing when she travels as the prime minister’s wife but she is effectively a representative of New Zealand on her husband’s official visits and should have such travel officially funded as of right.

September 12, 2009

E noho rā, but not goodbye, I think…

When I began this blog on December 8 2007 it was intended to be a very Wellington and New Zealand blog that broke news stories, presented journalistically researched backgrounder articles and didn’t just offer inane comment on links to news stories published on media websites, the latter such offerings being the mainstay of most blogs.

Most of what I published here depended on my being in Wellington every day and seeing what was going on, what people were interested in, and what the big issues were. I got out and about, interviewed people, and published their stories on this blog. I put it into historical context. After all, I am a journalist, and my university studies in the 1980s trained me in history and political science.

However, as must be obvious, I am not here any more. Poneke is the original Maori transliteration for the British settler name given to Wellington, Port Nicholson. It is somewhat strange, and possibly even duplicitous, to name a blog Poneke’s Weblog when its author has moved on.

It has been great fun blogging. My site meters say that I have written 533 articles since the blog began, that readers of the blog have contributed 6886 comments, and as of today there have been 505,256 page views. This is very swollen headed stuff as according to Tumeke’s blog rankings, I have often been in the top 20 New Zealand blogs, up there with people who post a dozen articles a day or more compared with my one or so a day.

Despite no longer living here, I don’t want to close this blog. Many archived articles on it get scores of hits most days via Google, meaning, to me, that those articles are worthwhile and worthy of remaining in the public domain.

Current events also continue to arouse, infuriate and send me to the keyboard, so it would be wrong for me to say I will not keep blogging. I am sure I will. But I also have a very good life, and one thing I have learned from the Blogosphere is that those who spend the most time in it do not have anything much better to do, which is sad.

Life is not something that should be lived in cyberspace.

The big regret I have from this blog is that, despite constantly revealing the under-use of Wellington’s expensive trolley buses, they continue to run only sporadically during weekday daytimes, only occasionally on weeknights, and never on weekends. This is despite ratepayers and taxpayers providing $9 million in subsidies for these gold-plated buses to run seven days a week from first bus to last.

Nobody in authority gives a damn, especially the Greater Wellington Regional Council, which pays the money and whose members and officers usually did not even bother replying to my complaints about this scandal, and held behind closed doors the meeting where these wimps agreed not to require the weekend trolley operation demanded by the contracts they signed in May 2007.

Thus, Wellington’s streets will remain filled with thundering diesel buses. But at least, I suppose, my eardrums are not being battered by their din.

August 13, 2009

A belated and shamefully unremarked 60th birthday greeting to Wellington’s darkest secret, its trolley buses

Silver GhostThe 40th anniversary of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin making the first Moon landing reminded me I’d completely overlooked another anniversary as close to my heart as that long ago great leap for mankind. Shamefully, it is not being celebrated and indeed has not even been mentioned anywhere except on this blog, belatedly, today .

I am speaking of the 60th anniversary of the opening of Wellington’s trolley bus system, which even I overlooked.

On June 20 1949, trolley buses began gliding through the city and along Oriental Parade then up the Carlton Gore Rd hill to Roseneath. Over the following 28 years, their wires were strung through the streets to Wadestown, Hataitai, Karori, Northland, Aro St, Miramar, Seatoun, Island Bay, Lyall Bay, Newtown Park and Kingston, the latter being the last expansion of the service, in 1987, when the Route 7 wires were extended from Mornington.

Wellington’s first trolley buses were painted silver and became known as the Silver Ghosts, on account of their quietness compared with diesel buses and with the clanking trams that most of the trolley bus routes replaced. The silver trolley pictured above is one of the ghosts from the early 1950s, now preserved by fanatical gunzels (transport enthusiasts) and stored at the Karori bus depot.

Shamefully, there will be no commemoration of what is one of the English speaking world’s longest lived trolley bus systems.

Absolutely nothing marked the June 20 anniversary.

The current owners of the trolleys, Infratil, had no interest and probably didn’t even know there was such an anniversary, despite the little-used trolleys being the main reason for the huge profits the company makes from its Go Wellington operation.

The gunzels who look after the Silver Ghost and other historic trolleys stored at Karori rejected my request earlier this year to stage an anniversary tour that day (there was such a tour on the 50th birthday in 1999, supported by the former owner, Stagecoach), saying they would commemorate it at Labour Weekend.

But last month, the powers that be who hate trolleybuses decided there will be no weekend trolley bus services. The gunzels have been told they will not be allowed to hold a trolley festival at Labour Weekend, or any weekend, as trolley buses have henceforth been forbidden to run at weekends, by decree of Greater Wellington Regional Council (which actually pays out $9 million a year in public money to have trolleys run seven days a week from dawn to midnight, but that’s a story you all know already, and GWRC does not like being reminded).

This is all shameful, as it was an anniversary worth celebrating. Few trolley bus systems in the English speaking world survived for 60 years. In many Anglo places, including all of Britain, all of Australia, all of the US and Canada (barring Vancouver, Seattle, San Francisco, Dayton, Boston and Philadelphia, which still have them), and in Auckland, New Plymouth, Christchurch and Dunedin, trolley buses were just a footnote to transport history between the trams they replaced and the diesel buses that replaced the trolleys.

Some 340 cities in Europe, Asia and the Americas still operate trolley buses and they have returned to cities such as Rome that scrapped them many years ago. Currently, the world’s oldest trolley bus system is the one in Shanghai, where the first trolley rolled in 1914. The oldest system in North America is in Philadelphia, which started using trolley buses in 1923. The oldest system in western Europe is the large network of Lausanne in Switzerland, which opened in 1932. Britain’s last trolley buses ran in Bradford in 1972, though nearby Leeds looks set to be the first British city to reinstate them, as trolley buses are gaining a new popularity.

Despite the current costly purchase of some 60 new trolley buses for Wellington, this distinctive transport mode seems out of favour here, again. In 1964, the fleet reached its maximum of 119 vehicles, and though 88 new ones replaced the originals between 1981 and 1986, many of them (including 20 flash Ansaldo trolleys obtained in 1985) were scrapped after less than six years on the road, leaving about 60 of the original 68 familiar Volvos to soldier on from 1990, in a minor role in a network now dominated by diesel buses. Despite the purchase of new trolleys and the wiring of Taranaki St for trolleys in 1985 and the Kingston extension in 1987, several routes were closed, including the Northland line in 1972 and the original Roseneath and Wadestown routes in 1987.

There was a new trolley bus spring during the 1990s, when businessman Ross Martin became manager of the privatised system (bought by Stagecoach from the former owner, Wellington City Council). Ross was something of a gunzel himself. He seemed to have a boyish enthusiasm for trolley buses. During his tenure, night and weekend trolley services resumed after a 20-year absence and, in 2003 and 2005, he bought the three low-floor Designline prototypes, 301, 302 and 303, to demonstrate the abilities of modern trolley buses. I was on one of the demonstration rides provided for doubting regional councillors and he looked as happy as a pig in muck as he showed off the trolley’s features.

But though the new yellow three-axle Designline trolleys were eventually ordered as a result, they are rarely used, with most weeknight, all the weekend, and many of the weekday daytime trolley services being operated by diesel buses, many of them the oldest diesels in the fleet, just to give the fingers to passengers, and to the ratepayers and taxpayers who pay that $9 million a year for trolley buses that are hardly ever on the roads.

I put this lack of enthusiasm for trolleys down to the change of ownership in November 2005, when Stagecoach sold out to Infratil, which is happy to have the exclusive GWRC contracts for the wired routes, but finds it too much bother actually to run trolleys on them, especially as there are no penalties for running diesel buses on the wired routes, and many benefits to the company and its drivers for using diesels, the older the better.

Given Greater Wellington Regional Council’s lack of interest in requiring the use of trolley buses that its contract with Go Wellington legally demands, and given Go Wellington’s preference to run elderly, cheap diesel buses on the trolley routes, and given Wellington City Council’s sabotaging of the overhead wire maintenance contracts (used as the excuse not to run weekend trolleys) I very much doubt there will be a 70th anniversary of Wellington’s remarkable trolley buses.

But hey, as I say, predictions usually turn out to be wrong.

August 9, 2009

Bumblebee trams roll proudly through Melbourne while Wellington bumbles timidly on

Route 96 BumblebeeThis is what Wellington is missing out on, why it is not the world-class city it should be. This is a modern tram in Melbourne running on Route 96, the busiest of that city’s many tram routes.

Route 96 runs over a former short railway line (from St Kilda) then over street tracks through the city centre and on to East Brunswick on the other side of the CBD (where the photo above was taken).

Its Wellington equivalent would be running trams like the ones pictured from Johnsonville to the city via the existing railway line, then on-street through the Golden Mile to Newtown and beyond. Such a service would revolutionise transport in Wellington.

But we don’t have the imagination or the courage to build world-class infrastructure like this.

Melbourne keeps building new tram lines, and has been doing so continuously for decades. It also keeps buying new trams, always bigger, longer, faster and better than those that came before.

The trams pictured above are the latest model French Alsthom-built Citadis lowfloor trams, found all over Europe and now in Melbourne, where they are known as “Bumblebees” on account of their colourscheme.

They are articulated in five sections, are 32 metres long, and easily carry more than 200 passengers each.

Five Bumblebees, worth $5 million each, run on the 96 alongside similar sized German-built Siemens Combino trams (one is pictured below running on the former St Kilda railway alignment that makes this route so fast and popular, the way the Johnsonville line should be. Just imagine this tram, racing across the overbridge at Crofton Downs).

Melbourne has just gone out to tender for 50 more similar trams, needed to augment the 500 trams it already has, because patronage is growing constantly, so good is the service. Wellington can’t even run trolley buses properly, hiding them in their depots most of the time. Bah. Combino St Kilda

August 7, 2009

What’s sauce for the geese becomes sauce for the porker

helen&michael

What goes round comes around. During the Helen Clark years, right-wing bloggers delighted in regularly publishing a photo of Clark and Michael Cullen (above) that made the duo appear a pair of sneering snobs.

Left-wing blogs are now getting their own back, gleefully publishing a photo of Finance Minister Bill English (below) sporting a distinctly trough-snorting expression.

bill

August 6, 2009

Happy 18th Birthday, World Wide Web

Another anniversary, one I haven’t missed. Today is the 18th anniversary of the effective creation of the World Wide Web.

The web’s inventor, Tim Berners-Lee of the CERN laboratory in Geneva (home of the Large Hadron Collider), put the world’s first website online this day in 1991. He had earlier created hypertext markup language (HTML) which made the Web possible.

His post this day in 1991 read: “The WorldWideWeb (WWW) project aims to allow all links to be made to any information anywhere. [...] The WWW project was started to allow high energy physicists to share data, news, and documentation. We are very interested in spreading the web to other areas, and having gateway servers for other data. Collaborators welcome!”

It was one of the great moments of human history, yet barely remembered, let alone celebrated. I predict in times to come, it will be.

All three of my children have grown up with the Internet (of which the Web is but one, but a huge, part — email for example was around for more than a decade before the Web, though confined to such places as universities).

I marvelled in January 1996 how my daughter, then three, took hold of the computer mouse of our new home computer connected to the Net by the amazingly fast 14.4 dial-up modem and navigated her way on the Web as if she had been born to it, which of course she had been.

Windows 95 had been launched the year before without a Web browser, as Bill Gates believed the Internet would never take off. It was the world of geeks, and as the world’s biggest geek, he couldn’t see a commercial application.

I’m proud to have joined the Net with Netscape Navigator version one, the first really good browser.

Gates soon caught up, and Windows 98 had Internet Explorer built in, quickly eclipsing Navigator, whose technology is now the basis of Firefox and similar independent browsers.

Today, we would wonder how we could ever be without the Net and especially without the Web.

In 1970, Alvin Toffler enriched himself by writing a book, Future Shock, which basically claimed humanity was doomed because we could not keep up with the pace of technolgical development. Twenty-one years afterwards the Web was invented and humanity has not looked back. Toffler and every other predictor of doom has always been proved wrong.

I’m amazed I can remember how life was before the Net. I’d never go back there. Especially to the Imperial 66 typewriters I started my journalism career on at the New Zealand Herald.

Happy Birthday WWW.

August 5, 2009

Field goes down, Lange is vindicated, English paying some of it back — NZ proved again to be the least corrupt nation, but vigilance must always be eternal

The conviction of former Labour member of Parliament Taito Phillip Field on 26 charges of bribery, corruption and attempting to pervert the course of justice is further welcome evidence that New Zealand is one of the least corrupt countries on Earth.

Field is the first New Zealand MP ever to have been found guilty of corruption and there is good reason for this. Our parliamentarians, public servants, police and judges are in the main decent people who would not contemplate taking or offering bribes or otherwise engaging in illegal acts. Public officials are so rarely charged with corruption because they so rarely engage in it. When they do they are vigorously prosecuted.

This is a measurable fact. Transparency International, the Berlin-based independent organisation that exists to expose corruption everywhere it exists – and it exists in plenty in much of the world – consistently rates New Zealand as one of the least corrupt countries anywhere.

Indeed, its last annual report ranked New Zealand the very least corrupt country, equal first out of 180 countries with Denmark and Sweden. Australia is ranked ninth, the UK 16th and the USA 18th.

The Field case demonstrates why New Zealand is accorded such a glowing place because it involves not just a member of Parliament, but a man who was a Minister of the Crown when he used and abused his position to promise favours to illegal immigrants in return for them working on his many private residences and rental homes.

In 2006, when the much-denigrated report into Field’s affairs by Noel Ingram QC was published, I recall reading through page after page of it, astonished by its detail of Field taking vans full of illegal migrants from property to property to undertake painting and other work on them.

“Where does he find time to be a member of Parliament?” I asked a Cabinet minister at the time. “Well might you ask,” the minister responded.

Field demonstrably put his private business affairs – his huge holding of rental properties – above the parliamentary and political duties for which he was paid far in excess of the wages earned by the hard-working people of his Mangere electorate. In that, he was much like National’s Richard Worth, who always seemed too busy riding camels in Cairo or promoting private businesses in India to be attending to his duties to the New Zealand public who paid his huge salary.

But Field was far more than putting his private interests first, he was also demanding and getting what amounted to bribes, then, when Noel Ingram was set reluctantly on him by former prime minister Helen Clark, he got the illegal migrants he was preying on to lie to Ingram. The police started looking closely at him the moment the Ingram report was published and his lengthy trial, which ended this week, was the result.

In 1996, when Field, then MP for Otara, sought the Mangere nomination after David Lange’s decision to retire from Parliament, Lange did everything he could to stop Field getting it. Lange knew Field was a bad one. Lange failed to stop Field replacing him as MP for Mangere but his stance then has been resoundingly vindicated.

Field now faces several years in jail and they will be well deserved. This man has shamelessly and shamefully abused his public position for personal gain.

Some might try to suggest that MPs rorting the parliamentary allowance system like Finance Minister Bill English has been exposed as doing is tantamount to corruption but legally it is not. All English and many MPs from most parties have done for as long as parliamentary allowances have been available is structure their affairs to take best advantage of them, within the rules.

That English has today announced he will pay back some $12,000 of the money taxpayers have given his wife to rent their own principal place of residence in Karori, Wellington, shows English has realised, finally, that he cannot preach dismal restraint for everyone else while dining at the taxpayer trough so outrageously as he has done, even though his dining is within the rules that our MPs set for themselves. I’d congratulate him if he’d only pay all the money back and stop trying to claim he’s entitled to any public money to live in his own house.

The English scandal kept getting worse, because it was revealed he’d had the mansion classified as a ministerial home to get an even bigger allowance, and had it put into his wife’s name from the family trust they had previously used.

It’s instructive that David Farrar, National’s pollster, has had nothing to say on English’s repayment as of 8.30pm tonight, despite him spinning furiously in support of English’s “right” to get the payment in the comments section on his blog previously, and his triumph over Field’s conviction.

New Zealand might be the least corrupt country on Earth, but to retain that honour requires eternal vigilance, not just on the part of our law enforcement agencies, but especially by the news media to expose without fear or favour such criminal abuses of power as perpetrated by Field and to expose such gorging at the public trough as perpetrated by MPs like Bill English, Roger Douglas and no doubt many more from all sides of the House.

It is the certainty that they will be exposed that will continue to make MPs and public officials ask themselves whether it is worth grabbing the “entitlements” they deny everyone else, and ensure that when the very rare cases of genuine corruption, such as Field’s, are committed, the perpetrators will continue to face vigorous prosecution and be thrown in jail where they belong.

August 3, 2009

NZ’s political leaders want to destroy us with despair. Where is their confidence in our country? No wonder Australia beckons for so many

Originally published July 21, but it daily still has resonance. Since I wrote it, Australia has become the only OECD member not to fall into recession, while in New Zealand the finance minister continues to delight in his “demoralising trudge” of layoffs and cutbacks.

One of life’s curiously interesting delights comes with being away for a while and returning to discover all at once what has happened during the entire length of one’s absence. I’ve just had such an experience.

Whoever would have imagined, for example, that becoming a celebrity fawned over by the media would ensure a jury would acquit you of mass murder, despite overwhelming, forensic evidence of your guilt? But David Bain managed it.

Or that National’s Melissa Lee could lose the Mt Albert byelection, despite David Farrar cunningly setting her up for victory? But even David couldn’t have foreseen their government announcing it would cut a motorway through the heart of the electorate rather than building the previously planned tunnel. It was a piece of political self-destruction up there with Rob Muldoon increasing the Auckland Harbour Bridge tolls a week before the 1980 East Coast Bays byelection to ensure Don Brash failed to win what had been a blue ribbon safe seat, and seemed just as deliberate. Nor would anyone have foreseen that Lee, an elegant Korean television journalist, would make bizarre racist attacks on the good people of South Auckland, ensuring a media frenzy.

Nor, deliciously, that the most uninspiring member of Parliament ever to have been elected to (and then lost) a safe seat, Richard Worthless, would be forced by the nice Mr Key to resign over – I could hardly believe it – a minor sex scandal involving at least two women. It was utterly depressing when this bore took over the Epsom seat from the distinguished Sir Douglas Graham, a man of enormous mana. It was no surprise at all that Worthless lost the former blue ribbon seat to Rodney Hide at the 2005 election, but shameful that he snuck back in on the party list. Good riddance at last to this lazy trough-feeder who demonstrably found his private business interests of greater importance than his ministerial duties and who, if he is remembered at all, it will be for his disgraceful tour of Cairo’s tourist spots rather than attending the commemorations for the Maori Battalion’s memorable part in the El Alamein battle, which taxpayers had funded him on as a member of a solemn New Zealand delegation.

Or that, astonishingly, a Corrections Minister was boasting how she had locked up more New Zealanders than ever before and kept promising to lock up still so many more that she intended to “house” them in shipping containers? Or that the Chief Justice would be attacked by the “Justice” Minister for raising the issue of the futility of imposing longer and longer sentences, thus causing the jails to bulge beyond capacity despite the crime rate actually falling for years?

The latter reminded me of Sir Douglas Graham telling me in the late 1980s – when he was a member of the National Opposition whose other MPs were attacking the Labour Government’s plans for a Bill of Rights Act – that he would rather have his rights protected by judges than by politicians.

Today I saw the dear old Business Roundtable, bless him, calling for the domestic purposes benefit to be abolished, to stop young women getting pregnant. At least the Roundtable drumbeat has been consistent since 1985, though pity that the authors whom dear Roger commissions for his predictable reports are becoming ever less authoritative. To hire an unqualified, beneficiary bashing talkback ranter like Lindsay Mitchell, when previously he engaged luminary academics from prestigious international institutions, suggests even the Roundtable is running out of money.

But all of this would just be a hilarious “welcome home” if it wasn’t for the appallingly sombre, helpless, despairing view of New Zealand as depicted by our own government.

In Australia, where I have had the opportunity to have travelled about these past few weeks, everyone except the media (which anywhere, always, promotes doom and gloom) is constantly upbeat about the state of the economy and the country’s outlook. The Polyannas include not just Kevin Rudd’s Labor Government but also Malcolm Turnbull’s Liberal Opposition. Yes, of course, the Opposition in Australia constantly attacks and carps on about the Government, but it does not attack and carp on about Australia.

Indeed, the most worrying thing about the Australian economy is that their media – after wallowing in doom for two years like ours has – have woken up to the fact that disaster has not happened, whether from the mildest flu strain for decades or the most-hyped recession since 1929. Today’s Melbourne Age predicted all might be well, that the economy is set to defy the destruction predicted for the last two years by… um… every media outlet in the world including The Age. Being a sceptical journalist, I full well know that neither journalists nor economists can accurately predict anything at all, but whatever we do predict invariably comes not to pass, at least not in the extreme form always forecast. So I pray desperately The Age is right for once in its predictions.

Numbingly, in New Zealand, it is our Government that is constantly attacking New Zealand and running down its fortunes and prospects at every opportunity. Chief among the Jonahs is the dour Finance Minister, Bill English, who constantly claims we face a “decade of deficits.” Even worse, at the New Zealand Herald’s annual platform for predictable corporate moaning, its Mood of the Boardroom breakfast, he said all we can look forward to is a “demoralising trudge”.

And then people were surprised that New Zealand’s still very strong economy was immediately put on credit watch. If your finance minister so publicly and continually rubbishes your country and takes as much delight in company closures and layoffs as this one does, then the ratings agencies will sit up, take notice and act, especially since they failed utterly to predict the collapse of the banks and other corporates they supposedly watch over.

Shame on your name, Bill. You have such a lovely wife. You need to let her cheer you up. A smile does not hurt. Having confidence in New Zealand would not be a sign of weakness; it would actually be a strength. Stop being such a dreary miseryguts.

I would not try to argue that the grass is always greener elsewhere, especially the grass in Australia, which is almost non-existent in some places I have been, thanks to the usual droughts which that huge desert continent experiences.

But, my god, there is no constant running down of Australia’s prospects by its political leaders, who are united in their determination to keep unemployment low and the economy ticking along very nicely thank you. You do not hear Australian cabinet ministers boasting how many public servants they are sacking.

New Zealand went into this world recession – caused by the corporate greed which some people in New Zealand think is admirable – with among the lowest unemployment and public debt in the developed world. The latter was thanks to former finance minister Michael Cullen’s determination to use his budget surpluses to repay debt rather than splurge on the tax cuts loudly demanded by National through all of Labour’s term. Cullen’s Scroogeness meant New Zealand can afford the modest deficits that would be expected in such an international downturn. Instead we are back to the slash and burn of 1991, when unemployment hit 11 per cent amid similar applause from the same cheerleaders.

Australia entered the world downturn similarly low in public debt – though with slightly higher unemployment – and there is little talk there of a decade of deficits. In fact, Australia is yet even to experience technical recession, as there has been just one quarter of negative growth, not repeated, since the Greed is Good parasites destroyed the world’s financial system.

I fear for a country being as constantly bad-mouthed by its government as New Zealand is, for the constant denigration is likely to bear the fruit that could be expected, as demonstrated by the negative credit watch, which the cheerleaders who looted New Zealand applaud from their tax havens in Geneva and elsewhere.

I fear for this country not for myself but for my children. All three of them talk of moving to Australia for work and education. Even from a distance, the allure of a country whose leaders do not constantly denigrate it is apparent to them. Having had a good look around a lot of Australia in recent times, I can understand that allure.

New Zealanders are not a bunch of losers, but many of our political leaders give more than the impression that losers are how they see us and a failed state is what they want us to become, even if unwittingly. They look like the losers. Maybe they should piss off to North Korea or Nauru or some other failed state that would welcome their mediocrity, and let a few people with confidence take us boldly and confidently into the future that so scares them.

That’s assuming we still have anyone with such confidence willing to take over the reins.

August 1, 2009

The deafening right blog silence over Bill English being paid to live in his own home

Gosh. The Dominion Post revealed today that Bill English — he who preaches cutbacks and redundancy for most of us – is getting a taxpayer subsidy close to $1000 a week to live in his own home in Karori with his wife and children.

These ministerial subsidies are meant to be paid for ministers who live outside Wellington, but who need to have accommodation in the capital for their ministerial duties at the Beehive and in Parliament.

English says he is the MP for Clutha-Southland and thus is “entitled” to claim the ministerial allowance to rent a home in Wellington.

I love that word “entitlement.” The other day, another slash-and-burn MP, Roger Douglas, was revealed as having taken a holiday in London with his wife at taxpayer expense. He was “entitled” to do so by virtue of the system, he said.

But Bill English is not just renting any home in Wellington. Taxpayers pay him to rent his own home, which he and his wife (or their family trust, which is the same thing) have owned, and lived in, for many years. His wife is a respected Wellington GP and their children attend Wellington schools. Their principal home is the one they live in in Karori, not their occasional weekend property in Dipton, Southland.

Early in the term of the Clark Labour Government, it was revealed that the Alliance Party trough-feeder Phillida Bunkle was claiming an out-of-Wellington allowance while actually living in Wellington. So was Labour cabinet minister Marian Hobbs.

At the time, what became the right wing of today’s blogosphere attacked Bunkle and Hobbs mercilessly, and with solid justification. Bunkle was scamming the taxpayer, shamelessly. Hobbs was not much better, but paid the money back.

Today, it is revealed Bill English is doing the same thing – but at a cost many times higher – and the silence of such blogs as Kiwiblog, Rust Never Sleeps and Whale Oil – is deafening, even though all three are actually voting delegates at the National Party conference, where this bombshell must be the talk of the floor.

As at 9pm tonight, not one of them has mentioned this on their frequently updated blogs — 14 hours after it became public. Maybe they were too busy trying to stop Wira Gardiner becoming the party’s new president.

From the Right, only Cactus Kate (a Hong Kong-based Kiwi tax lawyer at present travelling the world) has taken up this issue, and good on her for doing so. It makes a change from bashing beneficiaries, which has become the sad new world order for the kiwi blog right.

This could make a great satire. Having a life, I don’t have time tonight to write it. But I’d love to see Danyl’s take on this, when he gets the time.

When the usual suspects post their spin about this, I’ll post links.

  • Update 11.25am Sunday:Danyl has found time to give his take on the English rort — three out of five. But Kiwiblog, RNS and Whale have not yet posted a single article, not even a defence of it, despite all three busily posting other stories from the Nats conference. When I get back from our Sunday drive tonight, I’ll look again.

July 31, 2009

New study shows “buyer beware” is very much the maxim when it comes to organic food

Caveat emptor is a worthwhile dictum when it comes to organic food, free-range eggs, fair-trade coffee and all the similar appeals to Kelburn and Thorndon angst that people like me and you encounter daily.

Is there any way of proving those free-range eggs actually came from hens running about a farmyard rather than hens crowded in a battery cage? Of course not, so it is a leap of faith to pay twice as much for an egg in the belief that the free-range label might actually be true. Unless you can see the eggs being laid for yourself.

Similarly with foods claimed to be organic. A piece of organic rump steak looks exactly the same as a piece of real rump steak. An organic carrot or potato looks like the real thing. The only difference is the massive difference in price, and again, the leap of faith that one is actually buying something produced by genuine, prescribed organic farming methods.

Scams clearly abound. Organic fish, anyone? Pull the other one and pass the lemon, thanks.

The best thing organic food has going for it is rising demand both locally and internationally, meaning farmers and growers can earn more money by tapping this trendy, guilt-wracked market. Those who eat it (many of whom likely favour such scams as the carbon offsets sold by airlines) feel they are helping the world, which is also a valuable outcome, not to be sneered at in any way.

However, proponents of organic foods should not be able to claim that such products are better for people than traditionally produced foods. To make such a claim is as false as claiming quack “medicines” such as homeopathy are anything more than a placebo.

Many studies over the years have failed to find evidence that organic food is more nutritious than food grown traditionally. Now the study-of-all-studies has found the same.

Commissioned by the UK Food Standards Agency, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine looked at some 210 individual studies and concluded there was no reason to buy expensive organic food for nutritional reasons, and no extra health benefits to eating organic food rather than meat, fruits or vegetables grown by traditional methods:

The new research looked for the first time at the best evidence over the last 50 years, says a report about it in The Daily Telegraph .

After looking at 160 studies on the nutritional content of organic foods versus non organic it concluded there was no significant difference in vitamins and minerals that are important to human health. A further study of more than 50 studies on the health implications found no good evidence that organic food is better for you than non-organic.

Dr Alan Dangour, of the LSHTM, who carried out the studies, said the report was the most comprehensive review of the health benefits of organic food ever carried out.

“Our review indicates that there is currently no evidence to support the selection of organically over conventionally produced foods on the basis of nutritional superiority,” he said.

People will continue to believe what they want, especially when there is no evidence to support their belief. That is why quacks prey so profitably on the worried well who are also the biggest market for organic food.

But purveyors of organic food should not be allowed to claim their products are nutritionally better than traditionally produced foods. The evidence is conclusive that they are the same.

Cigarette companies once claimed their product was good for you. Right into the 1950s – when doctors were becoming seriously concerned at the mounting health toll from smoking – cigarettes were being advertised by avuncular men taking a patient’s pulse, with the caption claiming more doctors smoked and recommended Camels than any other brand.

Organic food is not unhealthy. Far from it. It is as good as food produced in the traditional way. Good fresh food is delicious and healthy food. But organic food is no better. To claim otherwise is to make claims as false as those once made for Camel cigarettes, or, as false as the claims also made today for homeopathy, naturopathy and all the other junk treatments the middle classes prefer over medicine that actually works.

Caveat emptor, as I said. And there really is one born every minute. And no, Barnum really didn’t say that.

July 23, 2009

Moon landing far more than the footnote to history Mr Farrar thinks

David Farrar, bless him, has an opinion on every subject known to humanity, and a few even more obscure, as we are so regularly reminded by his appearances in the news media, where breathless talkback hosts and television presenters almost daily seek his views as the celebthority to beat all celebthorities they regard him as, doubtless with good reason.

It was thus surprising this week to see David write on his blog that he was “too young to remember the moon landing, so like many don’t really comprehend how historic it was”. Speak for yourself, David, not the many, who, though they might not remember that incredible day, still have a very good grasp of its real historic importance.

David regards the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Empire as the most monumental events of his lifetime (and yes, he was alive when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon 40 years ago this week) and he doubts those political milestones will be “eclipsed” (a pun so good it must have been intended). In fact, compared with the Apollo 11 mission, those late-20th Century events were but footnotes in the dustbin of history.

What has made humankind so phenomenal a development on this small planet circling an ordinary star at the fringe of a minor galaxy is not the ebb and flow of Earth politics that is the galactic view of Mr Farrar and his like, but the extraordinary discoveries we humans have made and keep making and our preparedness to seek new and ever more daunting challenges, just because we can.

The moon landing is up there with the invention of the wheel, the taming of fire, the creation of writing and printing, Columbus’s discovery of the New World, powered flight, and, in the lifetime of many people, Hillary’s conquest of Everest, the invention of television and the Internet and so much more, where does one start? These and every other amazing thing we do are why we don’t live in trees or caves or under the sea and why flying to the moon trumps partisan politics.

The fall of the Iron Curtain and Soviet communism, politically important as they were at the time, marked but the end of not even a century of the delay of human progress in the parts of the world affected by them. There was no Soviet Empire before 1917 and no Berlin Wall before 1960, but there was remorseless human progress and endeavour for millennia before those things and there will be more progress and endeavour for millennia long after they have been forgotten.

Few people will long remember who was the last dictator of East Germany as the wall fell around him, but the names and achievements of Columbus, Hillary, Armstrong, Aldrin, Socrates, Gallileo, Gutenberg, Newton, Einstein and many more will never be forgotten.

That said, I’m in the mood for a lighter side of life. In the mid-1990s, when David Farrar and I stumbled on the wonders of the Internet, an email did the rounds purporting to reveal Neil Armstrong’s unreported real final words on the moon. Email hoaxes were a novelty back then and many wondered if it was true, as it purported to have come from a newspaper account of a speech Armstrong allegedly made. Of course it was not true, but it is still a very funny joke. This was it:

When Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong first walked on the moon, he not only gave his famous “one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” statement but followed it by other comments between him, the other astronauts and Mission Control. Just before he re-entered the lander, however, he made the enigmatic remark “Good luck, Mr Gorsky.” Many people at NASA thought it was a casual remark concerning some rival Soviet cosmonaut. However, upon checking, there was no Gorsky in either the Russian or American space programs. Over the years many people questioned Armstrong as to what the “Good luck, Mr Gorsky” statement meant, but Armstrong always just smiled. Then, on July 5 in Tampa Bay, Florida, while Armstrong was answering questions following a speech, a reporter brought up the 26-year-old question. This time, as Mr Gorsky had finally died, Armstrong felt he could answer the question. He explained that when he was a kid, he was playing baseball with a friend in the backyard. His friend hit a fly ball, which landed in the front of this neighbour’s bedroom windows. His neighbours were Mr and Mrs Gorsky. As he leaned down to pick up the ball, young Armstrong heard Mrs Gorsky shouting at Mr Gorsky. “Oral sex! You want oral sex? You’ll get oral sex when the kid next door walks on the moon!”

And while in this lighter frame of mind, I recalled a song that was regularly played on radio when I was younger. And yes, I am old enough to remember the moon landing, and very much young enough still to remember it.

It was performed by various artists over the years but it was written by John Stewart , (September 5 1939 – January 19 2008) who was best known for being a member of the American folk group the Kingston Trio, though he’d left the group by the time he wrote Armstrong. These are the lyrics:

Black boy in Chicago
Playin’ in the street
Not enough to wear
Not near enough to eat
But don’t you know he saw it
On that July afternoon
Saw a man named Armstrong
Walk upon the moon

Young girl in Calcutta
Barely eight years old
The flies that swarm the market place
Will see she don’t grow old
But don’t you know she heard it
On a July afternoon
Heard a man named Armstrong
Walk upon the moon

River’s getting dirty
The wind is getting bad
War and hate are killing off
The only earth we have
But the whole world stopped to watch it
On that July afternoon
Watched a man named Armstrong
Walk upon the moon

And I wonder if a long time ago
Somewhere in the universe
They watched a man named Adam
Walk upon the earth

The song was – viewed from today’s triumphant but temporary cynicism – a somewhat mawkish, sentimental one, but it really summed up the importance of Apollo 11 to all those of us, who, unlike David, watched it happen live on television, heard it on radio or read about it under the screaming headlines in the newspapers. I bet it’s been played on a radio station somewhere on Earth this week.

July 21, 2009

Go Wellington gets three more old diesel bangers for the trolley routes

Further evidence of the desire of all concerned to marginalise Wellington’s trolley buses is hardly needed, but wait, there is still more.

Go Wellington has just taken delivery of three more ancient, noisy, uncomfortable, high-floor MAN SL202 diesel buses dating from the 1980s. SL202s are the mainstay of the capital’s busiest bus route, the Number 3 Lyall Bay — Karori Park, which Go Wellington is paid handsomely to run modern low-floor trolley buses on, but hardly ever does.

These bangers and the even more uncomfortable MAN Coffins are used whenever possible on all the weekday daytime trolley bus services because the drivers and the bus schedulers prefer them not only over trolleys, but over modern low-floor diesel buses. As you will know, trolleys are also hardly ever used on weekday evenings and never at weekends, despite a public subsidy of $9 million a year to run them seven days a week from first bus to last.

The latest three SL202s have been obtained second-hand from NZ Bus’s Auckland operations, where they have been replaced by modern diesel buses.

Their numbers are 1693, 1694 & 1697 and they will be on a supposed trolley bus service near you from next week, meaning even less chance of riding one of the flash, modern trolleys you are paying through the nose for. Enjoy!